Crippa, M. et al. Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nat. Food 2, 198-209 (2021).
Google Scholar
Smil, V. Nitrogen and food production: proteins for human consumption. Ambio 31, 126-131 (2002).
Google Scholar
Van der Warf, H. & Petit, J. Assessment of the environmental impact of agriculture at the farm level: a comparison and analysis of 12 indicator-based methods. Agric. Ecosystem. About. 93, 131-145 (2002).
Google Scholar
Poore, J. & Nemecek, T. Reducing the Environmental Impacts of Foods by Producers and Consumers. Science 360, 987-992 (2018).
Google Scholar
Takahashi, N., Orita, T. & Hirose, M. Production of chicken ovalbumin in Escherichia coli. Uncomfortable 161, 211-216 (1995).
Google Scholar
Ercili-Cura, D. & Barth, D. Cellular agriculture: foods grown in the laboratory (American Society of Chemistry, 2021).
Voutilainen, E., Pihlajaniemi, V. & Parviainen, T. Economic comparison of dietary protein production with unicellular organisms from lignocellulose side streams. Bioresour. Technol. representing 14, 100683 (2021).
Google Scholar
United States Food and Drug Administration. GRAS notice for non-animal whey proteins resulting from fermentation by Trichoderma reesei https://www.fda.gov/media/136754/download (2019).
Zhou, X. et al. Promotion of new plant-based dishes to older consumers using ‘daily special’ as an incentive strategy in 4 EU countries. Food grade Prefer. 75, 260-272 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wender, BA et al. Anticipatory life cycle analysis for responsible research and innovation. J. Responsible for Innov. 1, 200-207 (2014).
Google Scholar
Dijkman, TJ, Basset-Mens, C., Antón A. & Núñez, M. in Life cycle assessment: theory and practice (eds Hauschild, MZ, Rosenbaum, RK & Olsen, SI) 723-754 (Springer International Publishing, 2017).
Guinea, JB et al. in Lifecycle Assessment Handbook: ISO Standards Operational Guide (eds Guinea, JB et al.) 525-634 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002).
Moro, A. & Lonza, L. The carbon intensity of electricity in European Member States: impacts on GHG emissions from electric vehicles. Transp. Res. D Transp. About. 64, 5-14 (2018).
Google Scholar
Treyer, K. Electricity production, high voltage, to market, Finland, IF, allocation, cut-off by classification. Ecoinvent database, version 3.6 (2014).
Treyer, K. Electricity production, high voltage, to market, Poland, PL, allocation, cut-off classification. Ecoinvent database, version 3.6 (2014).
Global Food LCA Database. Archetype feed basket, industrial poultry laying system, as DM (WFLDB) / RER, U https://quantis-intl.com/metrics/databases/wfldb-food/ (Quantis, 2018).
Tsai, J.-H., Huang, J.-Y. & Wilson, D. Life cycle assessment of cleaning-in-place operations in egg yolk powder production. J. Clean. Prod. 278, 123936 (2021).
Google Scholar
European Commission. Regulation (EU) No. 517/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of April 16, 2014 on fluorinated greenhouse gases and repealing Regulation (EC) No. 842/2006 https://www.eea.europa.eu/policy-documents/regulation-eu-no-517-2014 (European Environment Agency, 2014).
Van Paassen, M., Braconi, N., Kuling, L., Durlinger, B. & Gual, P. Agri-footprint 5.0 Part 1: Methodology and basic principles https://www.agri-footprint.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Agri-Footprint-5.0-Part-1-Methodology-and-basic-principles-17-7-2019.pdf (Agricultural footprint, 2019).
Category 2 Product Environmental Footprint Rules Guide, Version 6.3, December 2017 https://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/smgp/pdf/PEFCR_guidance_v6.3.pdf (European Commission, 2017).
SimaPro. LCA software to help you drive change https://www.pre-sustainability.com/sustainability-consulting/sustainable-practices/custom-sustainability-software (2020).
Huijbregts, MAJ et al. ReCiPe2016: a harmonized method for evaluating the impact of the life cycle at the median and final level. Int. J. Life cycle assessment. 22, 138-147 (2017).
Google Scholar
Boulay, A.-M. et al. The WULCA Consensus Characterization Model for Water Scarcity Footprints: Assessing the Impacts of Water Use as a Function of Remaining Available Water (AWARE). Int. J. Life cycle assessment. 23, 368-378 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gésan-Guiziou, G. et al. Life cycle analysis of a milk protein fractionation process: contribution of the production and cleaning steps to the unit process level. Sep. Purif. Technol. 224, 591-610 (2019).
Google Scholar
Santos, HCM Jr., Maranduba, HL, de Almeida Neto, JA & Rodrigues, LB Life cycle analysis of the cheese production process in a small dairy industry in Brazil. About. Sci. Pollute. Res. Int. 24, 3470-3482 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zouaghi, S. et al. Study of the effect of an antifouling surface modification on the environmental impact of a pasteurization process: an LCA study. ACS Support. Chem. Ing. seven, 9133-9142 (2019).
Google Scholar
Noya, LI et al. An Environmental Assessment of the Food Supply Chain Using Life Cycle Assessment: A Case Study of Gluten-Free Biscuit Products. J. Clean. Prod. 170, 451-461 (2018).
Google Scholar
Althaus, H.-J. et al. Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods. Data v. 2.2 (2010) https://docplayer.net/14249358-Implementation-of-life-cycle-impact-assessment-methods.html (Swiss Center for Life Cycle Inventories, 2007).
Humbird, D. et al. Process design and economy for the biochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol: dilute acid pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of the corn stalk https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/47764.pdf (NREL, 2011).
Harjanne, A. & Korhonen, JM Abandonment of the concept of renewable energy. Energy policy 127, 330-340 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ahkola, H. et al. Presence of active pharmaceutical ingredients in the continuum of surface and groundwater used in the production of drinking water. About. Sci. Pollute. Res. 24, 26778-26791 (2017).
Google Scholar
Environmental Services of the Helsinki Region. Where does your drinking water come from? https://hsyk01mstrxfa10prod.dxcloud.episerver.net/en/water-and-sewers/how-the-water-supply-works/#Veden%20hankinta%20ja%20puhdistus (HSY, 2021).
Eurostat. Annual freshwater withdrawals by source and sector https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/ENV_WAT_ABS__custom_344624/default/table?lang=en (Eurostat, 2020).
Umweltbundesamt Hauptsitz. Drinking water in Germany again classified “Very good” https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/en/press/pressinformation/drinking-water-in-germany-again-rated-very-good (UBA, 2018).
Wiebe, M. Myco-protein Fusarium venenatum: a well established product for human consumption. Appl. Microbiole. Biotechnology. 58, 421-427 (2002).
Google Scholar
Simmons, T. Guide to good practices and management of uncertainties in national greenhouse gas inventories: CO2 Emissions from stationary combustion of fossil fuels (IPCC, 2000).
Emission Factor Database 2006 https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/EFDB/find_ef.php (IPCC, 2020).
TO WRAP UP. Case study: UK beverage industry. Cleaning in place www.wrap.org.uk (WRAP, 2006).
Eide, MH, Homleid, JP & Mattsson, B. Life cycle analysis (LCA) of cleaning-in-place processes in dairies. Lebensme. Wiss. Technol. 36, 303-314 (2003).
Helsinki Region Environmental Services Authority. Viikinmäki wastewater treatment plant. HSY 1/2017 https://www.hsy.fi/sites/Esitteet/EsitteetKatalogi/viikinmaki_tekninenesite_en.pdf (HSY, 2017).
Järviö, N., Maljanen, N.-L., Kobayashi, Y., Ryynänen, T. & Tuomisto, HL An attributional assessment of the life cycle of microbial protein production: a case study on the use of bacteria oxidizing hydrogen. Sci. About. 776, 145764 (2021).
Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. FoodData Central: eggs, yolks only, raw https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/1100203/nutriments (USDA, 2020).
United States Department of Agriculture. FoodData Central: egg, white only, raw https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/1100199/nutriments (USDA, 2020).
Daengprok, W., Garnjanagoonchorn, W. & Mine, Y. Fermented pork sausage enriched with commercial calcium lactate or chicken eggshell. Sci meat. 62, 199-204 (2002).
Google Scholar
European Commission. Climate-friendly alternatives to HFCs https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/f-gas/alternatives_en (European Commission, 2014).
Järviö, N., Henriksson, PJG & Guinea, JB Including GHG emissions from LULUC mangrove forests in LCA: a case study of shrimp farming in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Int. J. Life cycle assessment. 23, 1078-1090 (2018).
Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. FoodData Central: Egg, White, Dried https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/323793/nutrients (USDA, 2019).
Helton, JC, Johnson, JD, Sallaberry, CJ & Storlie, CB Survey of sampling methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Reliab. Ing. Syst. Saf. 91, 1175-1209 (2006).
Google Scholar
Heijungs, R. On the number of Monte Carlo trials in comparative probabilistic LCA. Int. J. Life cycle assessment. 25, 394-402 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mendoza Beltran, A. et al. Quantified uncertainties in comparative life cycle analysis: what to conclude? About. Sci. Technol. 52, 2152-2161 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lee, JS, Lee, MH, Chun, Y.-Y. & Lee, KM Uncertainty analysis of water scarcity footprint based on AWARE model taking into account temporal variations. The water ten, 341 (2018).
Google Scholar
Heijungs, R. Selecting the best product alternative in a sea of uncertainty. Int. J. Life cycle assessment. 26, 616-632 (2021).
Google Scholar
